Digital Mental Health and Its Discontents: Assumptions About Technology That Create Barriers to Equitable Access.

Despite the potential of digital mental health interventions to aid recovery for people with serious mental illness, access to these digital tools remains a key barrier. In this column, the authors discuss three key assumptions that shape the integration of digital mental health tools into community health settings: clinical context, digital literacy, and financial burden. Clinical contexts have shifted with the increased use of telehealth, altering intervention environments; access to a mobile device is not the same as digital literacy; and digital mental health care is not necessarily affordable. Context-centered study design through ethnography will facilitate transfer of digital resources to real-world settings.

Living the Process: Examining the Continuum of Coercion and Care in Tijuana's Community-Based Rehabilitation Centers.

In Mexico, community-based, non-biomedical treatment models for substance use are legally recognized in national drug policy, monitored by state-level Departments of Health, and in some cases publicly funded. Academic research on centers that utilize these forms of treatment have focused primarily on documenting their rapid spread and describing their institutional practices, particularly human rights abuses and lack of established biomedical efficacy. In Tijuana, these community-based therapeutic models are shaped by conceptions of health and illness from the local cultural context of the United States-Mexico border zone in ways that do not cleanly match western, biomedical notions of the illness "addiction." In this article, I examine treatment ethics by exploring the contextually understood need for coerced treatment (i.e., why centers are locked) along with experiences of compulsion in a women's 12 Step center. These discussions highlight the contested therapeutic value of coercion from multiple perspectives. Utilizing engaged listening around local care practices marks a path for global mental health researchers to understand and sit with difference in order to communicate across opposing viewpoints in the service of mental health equity and best care practices.